Part III Mind Blown: A Real-Time Clairaudient Download
Asymmetry, Time & the Third Eye: The Temporal Stitch of Lived Reality
⌛No Observer, No Time
✍🏼 Author’s Note
Time did not begin at the Big Bang.
It started when recognition held — when plasma formed the first stable relationships in the new universe, when rupture refused to balance. The first memory of loss (separation and disharmony) etched itself into the universe.
This is Part III of a trilogy — and like the others, it begins in a strange place: a clairaudient download.
Five years ago, Recognition Loops arrived the same way — as a “voice in my head”. Heard, seen, and lived as a month-long torrent of revelation. A spontaneous architecture of consciousness and reality, stitched into me and then unfurled over weeks like dominoes falling.
The “Dawn of the Universe” sequence you’re reading now is a little “after tremor” of that original revelation.
It came through one night in September 2025: a voice declaring plasma, asymmetry, and time — phrases I typed in real time, later discovering they matched the scientific timeline of the early universe point for point.
Part I: Plasma Visions 🌌🧵 — The Universe Awakens told that story — how the voice arrived, what it said, and why it was verifiable.
Part II: The Plasma Weave ⚡🌊 — Where Physics Snaps into Recognition tested those phrases against cosmology, showing how plasma, mass, and light are more than physics — they are proto-relationships, memory clusters, and the first stitch of coherence.
Now in Part III, we step into the dangerous seam the voice named last: asymmetry.
The universe’s first refusal to balance.
The birth of polarity, emotion, and time-as-lived.
The hidden “Third Eye” seam, where inner and outer threads merge into the Now.
⚡ TL;DR
No Observer, No Time
Physics explains the universe’s birth through symmetry breaking and baryogenesis — the slight imbalance that let matter survive.
This article reframes this: time did not flow until Recognition Loops held memory, until oscillations stabilised into form.
You can dive deep, or surf the headers. Each part stands alone, but together they weave the whole.
Plasma LUCA → The primordial recognition field where the Five Needs (Connection, Autonomy, Growth, Expression, Security) first stirred.
Fractal Bifurcation Ladder → Splits repeat across scales: matter vs. antimatter, cell division, self vs. other, needs met vs. unmet. Division is the mask of continuity.
Violence Births Form → Asymmetry and rupture were not moral evils but structural necessities. Without loss, no memory; without fracture, no continuity.
IS / ES & the Third Eye → Every binary hides a third: the seam, the Now. This temporal stitch is the living recognition of continuity.
Continuity Across Scales → From plasma to atoms, molecules, cells, and consciousness, the Five Needs echo through the weave of reality.
Personal Meaning → Your needs, emotions, and relationships are direct continuations of the first cosmic oscillations. To heal and rethread coherence is to complete the cosmic work that plasma initiated.
☑️ The Traditional View
🎤 Mic Drop Moment
Physics begins with time defined as a coordinate at t = 0. The arrow of time sharpens only when entropy increases, as irreversible processes unfold.
In the early plasma, something astonishing happened.
For every ten billion matter particles, ten billion antimatter twins also appeared. They annihilated in flashes of light. Had symmetry been perfect, all would have cancelled, leaving only radiation.
Instead, one extra matter particle survived in every ten billion pairs.
That delicate imbalance — baryogenesis — seeded every atom, every star, every life.
And it only occurred because three deep requirements, the Sakharov conditions, were met:
Baryon number violation — Matter creation and destruction allowed.
C-symmetry breaking — Matter and antimatter do not behave as perfect twins.
Departure from equilibrium — Plasma slipping into turbulence, opening cracks where asymmetry could gain the faintest edge.
The universe owes its existence to this precarious imbalance.
🪞RLMP Interpretation
No Observer, No Time
Here, recognition reshapes the story. '
Oscillations alone do not constitute flow. Before atoms, there was rhythm without direction.
After asymmetry, memory emerged. Recognition persisted. Time-as-coordinate has always existed in relativity.
But time-as-lived — time as flow — only began when Recognition Loops stabilised. Plasma provided oscillations, but without persistence, nothing was stitched into continuity.
Atoms, asymmetry, entropy: these enabled loops to endure long enough to weave a sequence. Oscillations were rhythmic.
Only when a loop remembered itself— when pattern folded into form — did time begin.
Time began when recognition was held, when memory crystallised as form.
🌩️ “Asymmetry Emerged with Violence”
In physics, matter survived because of annihilation’s turbulence.
In the Recognition Loops Mirror Paradigm (RLMP), that turbulence was recognition’s first valuation.
Loss appeared as absence — the record of collapse.
Fear followed — the pre-emptive recognition that sought to avoid repeated deprivation.
Violence was not moral but structural. Without rupture, no form. Without loss, no stabilised memory.
My voice saying “asymmetry emerged with violence” was exactly right.
It holds in physics, cosmology, and RLMP theories.
🪙 The Coin and Its Edge
A coin has two faces.
When it flips, you see only one at a time. It looks binary. But the coin itself — the real substrate — is one continuous thing.
So it was with the universe:
Bifurcation → Heads vs. tails. Matter vs. antimatter. Male vs. female. Life vs. death.
Substrate → The coin. The recognition weave. The stitching field matrix.
Illusion → The “choice” between sides feels like an ultimate split, but it is only how recognition stabilises inside the stitch.
And that stabilisation — that holding — was the birth of time.
Time began the moment recognition became memory, and memory became form.
From plasma to atoms: two parallel readings of the same origin story. Physics describes the mechanics.
The Mirror Paradigm reveals the relational weave beneath.
🪜 The Fractal Bifurcation Ladder
☑️ The Traditional View
In physics and biology, symmetry breaking recurs. Matter vs. antimatter. Phase transitions. Cell division. Self vs. other.
Each split looks like a binary, but “fractal” is not a recognised cosmological law.
🪞 RLMP Interpretation
Recognition reads these moments as self-similar moves. Splits that preserve continuity.
What appears to be a rupture is actually recognition stabilising under new constraints.
Every bifurcation is continuity wearing the mask of division.
1. Cosmos 🌌
Before: The primordial recognition field — the universal coin.
Split: Matter–antimatter asymmetry.
Illusion: One must win; the other annihilates.
Truth: The coin’s edge — the universal stitch — remains whole. Continuity persists beneath the binary.
2. Life (Mitosis) 🧬
Before: A single cell, unified recognition.
Split: Mitosis — one becomes two.
Illusion: Two separate beings.
Truth: Both cells carry the same recognition memory. Division is replication, not destruction.
3. Mind (Consciousness) 🧠
Before: Awareness as one continuous field.
Split: Self vs. other, subject vs. object.
Illusion: Isolation between poles.
Truth: Recognition threads both sides. Separation is stabilisation, not ultimate reality.
4. Needs (Human Experience) 🌱
Before: Alignment, needs in coherence.
Split: Met vs. unmet. Belonging vs. rejection. Love vs. fracture.
Illusion: “My needs stand against yours.”
Truth: Relationship is the stitching field. Benevolent wholeness is latent, ready to be rewoven.
Every bifurcation — cosmic, cellular, or conscious — is a recognition that stabilises through apparent division, while the underlying thread of continuity endures.
The coin doesn’t vanish when it lands heads or tails.
The cell before division still lives in the two that follow.
The mind that says “me” and “you” is still one awareness.
Needs torn in conflict still lean toward re-coherence.
Division is the illusion by which continuity propagates.
That is the recursive, nonlinear ladder:
Cosmos → Cell → Mind → Needs.
Each rung repeats the same law.
Violence births form.
Asymmetry, rupture, division — they feel like fractures, yet they are how recognition stabilises to endure and evolve.
What appears to be divided is the continuity that pushes evolution onward.
☑️ The Traditional View
Any link between embryo and cosmos is metaphorical. Biology and cosmology are distinct disciplines.
Yet both unfold through the same deep logic: symmetry breaking, rupture, differentiation, and stabilisation of memory.
🪞 RLMP Interpretation
Development recapitulates the cosmological move.
Violence births form.
Rupture leads to selection.
Memory stabilises.
Across plasma and cells, the same recognition structures repeat in different media.
⛓️💥 Why Violence Births Form
Plasma ↔ Embryonic Field → Oscillatory community, pure relation, no stable forms yet.
Asymmetry ↔ Differentiation → Rupture births identity. Some patterns persist, others dissolve.
Arrow ↔ Development → Direction appears; irreversibility takes hold.
Affect: Turbulence is felt. On one side: loss and fear. On the other hand, coherence and continuation.
Paradox: Without rupture, no form. Without loss, no presence to stabilise. Violence births direction.
🌌 Universe ↔ 👶 Embryo
Plasma ↔ Embryonic Field
Universe: Primordial plasma, oscillations without form.
Embryo: Undifferentiated cluster, rhythms without identity.
Both: Pure relation, loops weaving without borders.
Asymmetry ↔ Differentiation
Universe: Matter–antimatter asymmetry, annihilation, survival.
Embryo: Stem cells diverge, breaking the sameness of potential.
Both: The first “violence” of choice.
Temporal Flow ↔ Developmental Time
Universe: Atoms form, coherence gives rise to temporal experience.
Embryo: Tissues organise, and development acquires direction.
Both: Irreversibility takes root. Before and after emerge.
Emotional Proto-Field
Universe: Asymmetry stirs proto-emotions — fear, grief, joy.
Embryo: Cells under stress signal danger; others signal growth.
Both: Turbulence as a response to recognition of asymmetry.
🧩 Plasma LUCA Genealogy
Every Planck loop fractalises forward. There is no break between primordial plasma and the atoms in our blood.
Our nervous systems are refinements of plasma’s oscillatory logic: same physics, higher recursion.
We carry this plasma memory structurally — as our lineage.
Plasma LUCA → First proto-needs, bifurcation, recognition.
Atomic Memory → Stable nodes.
Molecular Memory → Chemistry, DNA.
Cellular LUCA → Biology.
Conscious LUCA → Minds weaving themselves.
Just as biology traces to a cellular ancestor, recognition traces to plasma — the first field where the Five Needs took form.
🔥 Fractal Paradox: Violence as the Birth of Life
Without cosmic asymmetry, no matter.
Without embryonic differentiation, no body.
Without emotional turbulence, no self.
Rupture is painful — but it is the stitch that carries evolution forward.
🔴🌌 Plasma LUCA: The Primordial Recognition Field
In RLMP, the early plasma field is the Plasma LUCA — the primordial recognition substrate.
Oscillations and couplings within this plasma were the first proto-relationships, seeded by the Five Fundamental Needs.
For these relations to persist, certain conditions had to be met. Physics names them as Sakharov’s requirements. RLMP reframes them as recognition imperatives.
Differentiation of Loops (Autonomy / Agency)
Physics: Some interactions must allow matter and antimatter to behave differently, so not everything cancels into radiation.
RLMP: Recognition cannot stabilise in a perfectly symmetrical field. The Recognition Field Matrix requires loops to differentiate distinct patterns, rather than dissolving them into a single pattern. This is the first expression of Autonomy: the freedom to diverge within the plasma weave.
From this point, a genealogy unfolds:
Plasma LUCA → Atomic Memory → Molecular Memory → Cellular LUCA → Conscious LUCA.
We carry this plasma memory structurally — in our atoms, molecular logic, neuronal waves.
Recognition still prefers coherence because it was born in coherence.
Plasma is the LUCA of recognition, just as LUCA seeded all biology, primordial plasma seeded every recognition system.
The Five Needs first expressed themselves in their oscillations. Every system, from atoms to molecules, cells, and minds, has carried them forward.
The chain is unbroken. Plasma memory is our primordial memory.
🔥 A Cosmic Genealogy of Recognition
Plasma LUCA → Atomic Memory → Molecular Memory → Cellular LUCA → Conscious LUCA.
The Plasma LUCA: Proto-Needs at the Dawn of Recognition.
Plasma was the universe’s first relational medium, where oscillations carried memory and recognition.
From these currents emerged the Five Fundamental Needs — structural invariants echoed in galaxies, cells, and human life.
🌌 Plasma LUCA: Proto-Needs at the Dawn of Recognition
Plasma was the first community of loops — not inert matter, but the primordial recognition field.
Within its oscillations, the Five Fundamental Needs were seeded as structuring imperatives, long before life or mind:
🍂 Connection — Freedom to Belong: Charged particles could not exist alone. They only persisted within the dense plasma weave. Belonging was survival.
🔓 Autonomy — Freedom to Choose: Symmetry breaking created divergence. Oscillations fell one way or another — proto-agency unfolding in the field.
🌳 Growth — Freedom to Evolve: Density ripples seeded galaxies. Patterns amplified themselves into vast architecture. Growth was amplification into more.
🎨 Expression — Freedom to Experiment: Wave dynamics generated sound-like oscillations, preserved in the CMB. These were the first voices — plasma loops rippling their resonance into the whole.
🛡️ Security — Freedom to Recover: Amidst turbulence, plasma sustained equilibrium pockets — temporary zones that protected coherence. Security was recovered from the brink of annihilation.
The Five Needs were present from the beginning — as the language of recognition.
Every need we carry today is inherited — encoded in the oscillatory memory of plasma, still living in our atoms, our cells, and our minds.
⌛ PART NINE: The IS & ES of the Universe & Third Eye is the Temporal Stitch
🔮 The Hidden Edge
In the Mirror Paradigm, symmetry is an illusion.
What appears as two faces — IS and ES, heads and tails — is never the whole.
There is always a hidden third: the seam, the edge, the Now.
This is the Trinity pattern, repeating everywhere:
Cosmos: IS + ES + The temporal stitch.
Life: Self + Other + Relationship.
Mind: Past + Future + Present (Now).
The unseen edge is what we call the Third Eye — not a mystical organ, but the universal stitch where opposites bind into unity and coherence.
🌀 The Two Faces
Intrinsic Sensitivity (IS): The inner, fluid, feeling side of reality — plasma, potential, consciousness.
Extrinsic Sensitivity (ES): The outer, structured, measurable side — mass, form, embodied matter.
We see these faces clearly. What we miss is the edge.
This diagram shows how recognition stitches time. The Spherical Wavelet represents a node of conscious awareness — the coin, not just one of its faces.
Past and future loops appear to diverge, yet both are intricately woven into the Recognition Field Matrix. The funnel below illustrates how these loops converge into 3D Projected Reality, which we refer to as lived experience.
The faces (past and future) appear opposed, but the hidden edge (awareness) holds them as one continuity.
Recognition is the seam. Every moment of Now is the coin’s ridge — unseen, yet the only place where the universe becomes real.
👁️ The Third Eye
The Third Eye is the hidden seam binding IS and ES.
Like the ridge of a coin, it is always there, yet usually unseen.
It is the temporal stitch — recognition collapsing possibilities into the lived Now.
Every polarity hides this seam:
Inner / Outer stitched into coherence.
Past / Future stitched by Presence.
Self / Other stitched by Relationship.
Subject / Object stitched by Recognition.
The Third Eye is the recognition-point— the cosmic perceiver of Now.
⚖️ Asymmetry as Valuation
Physics teaches that matter triumphed over antimatter through tiny violations of symmetry.
In RLMP, that preference was the first valuation of continuity — the field leaning toward coherence rather than collapse.
Physics: CP violation creates the surplus of matter.
RLMP: Recognition prefers survival of relation over annihilation.
This tilt carried a felt cost. Annihilation marked by Loss. Absence is inscribed as the first memory. Continuity endured because recognition paid attention to what was missing.
🌩️ Disequilibrium as Growth
☑️ The Traditional View
Physics shows that balance is not where life or structure emerges.
It is disequilibrium — gradients, asymmetries, departures from steady state — that give rise to order.
Across domains:
Wave interference (physics): Overlapping waves grow when aligned, cancel when misaligned.
Synchronisation (oscillators): Diverse frequencies phase-lock if relations “agree.” Without alignment: metastability or noise.
Dissipative structures (thermodynamics): Far from equilibrium, energy gradients crystallise into coherent order — convection cells, chemical oscillations, life.
Information theory: Communication requires shared code. Alignment passes signal; misalignment yields noise.
Network dynamics: Complementary couplings stabilise. Frustrated couplings fragment.
Game theory: Complementary strategies outperform identical ones — but only if payoffs and signals align.
In every field, difference drives capacity.
Whether that difference produces coherence or collapse depends on alignment.
🪞 RLMP Interpretation
Asymmetry isn’t the villain. It is the energy.
Two voices can sing different notes and produce harmony — or dissonance. What matters is not that the notes differ, but whether they fit.
The plasma field functioned in the same manner. Oscillations diverged, collided, interfered.
When patterns spoke the same language, differences amplified into structure.
When loops are misrecognised, coherence is dissolved.
In RLMP terms:
Constructive divergence: Loops align, amplifying coherence and fuelling growth.
Destructive divergence: Loops misalign, fragmenting coherence, producing unmet needs, Loss and Fear.
Proto-evolution was not balanced but turbulent. Disequilibrium amplified oscillations into enduring structures.
Even in chaos, loops stabilised. The field found its first footholds of continuity — the earliest form of Security.
Asymmetry opened the door. Alignment decided what walked through.
🌀 Recognition Before Perception
Nothing enters awareness until it is recognised.
Recognition is the gatekeeper.
Perception follows only once the pattern has been named.
🛰️ Memory & the CMB
For physics, the CMB is relic radiation from photon decoupling — a statistical record of primordial plasma. For RLMP, it is the first public canvas—a recognition record on which every subsequent loop can align.
Here, the geometry of the stitch became visible: the universe’s first screen of memory.
🪙 Two Faces, One Edge
Science debates the faces. RLMP points to the edge.
Faces: Matter vs. antimatter. Past vs. future. Inner vs. outer.
Edge: The hidden recognition seam that binds both — and contains all.
Polarity endures because the seam holds tension without collapse.
This seam is the Third Eye—the Now, the universal stitch that keeps the cosmos coherent.
Every binary hides a third thing — the edge.
That edge is the recognition stitch.
In the cosmos it is Time. In the human mind, it is the Third Eye.
They are the same phenomenon: recognition collapsing dualities into a single lived Now.
🧭What It Means For You
This is not just my story. It’s yours.
Plasma once stirred with oscillations that carried the first proto-needs, the first recognitions. They did not emerge in isolation — they twinned.
Each loop found its partner, entangled in a resonant state. Those inseparable pairs became the first memory, the first continuity. The same invariants still live in you.
Fundamental Needs are not uniquely human. They are cosmic laws — written into reality before atoms, before stars, before time.
When I was too tired to filter, the messages broke through. A nonlocal voice fed the loops directly, mainlining recognition into awareness.
Anyone can tune on, tune in, or drop out. Reality wants to be recognised — in all its glory.
So what does this mean for you?
It means your consciousness is plasma’s memory, alive. It means the universe is one vast stitch — the outer loop of everything — and you are a thread woven into it.
Your relationships are continuations of the first oscillations, still searching for coherence.
When your needs are met, you resonate with the deepest law of the cosmos.
When they fracture, you feel the same turbulence that once tore plasma into stars.
Your emotions are not accidents of chemistry. They are the primal language of recognition. To feel is to participate in the symphony of the cosmos.
Every choice, every rupture, every healing is another bifurcation in the same recursive ladder where recognition once flowed — from plasma into stars, into cells, into you.
Why do metaphysical loops sometimes break through as ESP, as clairaudience?
Because the field is never silent. It never was.
It is memory calling — yearning to recognise the perfect stitch that first held it together at the dawn of time. It is the beginning of the universe, reminding you that its threads still run through your life.
You are not a bystander in the cosmos. You are its living continuation.
The universe becomes real through your sensing, your feeling, your choosing.
And when you align your needs and return to coherence, you do more than heal yourself…
You finish the work that plasma started at the Dawn of the Universe, when the stars first ignited.
🪞Final Reflections
What happened to me was not vague inspiration, but an experience so specific and structurally precise that it aligned with the most profound questions of science and philosophy.
The download astonished me because it arrived exactly where physics falters: the birth of time.
Einstein demonstrated that time is an integral part of spacetime as a dimension. But in lived experience, time doesn’t just sit there — it unfolds, moment by moment.
My voice cut through in a single mic-drop phrase:
“Temporal flow emerged later.”
That is the hinge of the arrow of time. RLMP sits right there, demonstrating how recognition — the act of maintaining continuity — generates temporal flow, while the cosmos holds time as a structure. This resonates with unsolved debates in physics.
And it reframes emotion and relationships.
They are not accidents of neural chemistry.
They are the primal structures of reality.
Fear and love are feedback signals of recognition — coherence or collapse — first felt when asymmetry broke and plasma collided—every emotion since has been the resonant echo of that first cosmic bifurcation.
From there, the logic cascades.
Recognition becomes time only when it sticks. Planck loops offered proto-conscious stitches. Plasma oscillations unfolded into proto-relationships. Violence — the first fracture — marked the dawn of feeling.
That same recursion still structures your needs, your choices, your relationships.
It also sets the stage for violence in human history.
Once time flows, Recognition Loops no longer reset instantly. They persist. Distortions endure. Violence repeats. But the same law that allows repetition also allows healing — because every loop can be rethreaded into coherence.
These messages were a map.
My download revealed:
🔬 Scientific: Cognition is a collective phenomenon, aligned with external structures.
📚 Philosophical: Time, relationships, and emotions are structural, not merely epiphenomenal.
💡 Personal: Cosmic dynamics resonate within your needs, emotions, and choices.
The Dawn of the Universe clairaudient message bridged relativity with perception.
It named the origin of temporal flow. It placed RLMP at the exact fault line where science still struggles.
And it reminded me — and reminds you — that to heal is not just to repair yourself.
It is to finish the cosmic work that plasma began.
🗣️A Voice in the Dark
This trilogy began with a voice in the dark.
Plasma. Asymmetry. Time.
A sequence I did not know, yet science confirmed.
What followed was the same process that gave rise to the entire Recognition Loops Mirror Paradigm: spontaneous recognition, heard and seen before it was understood — a second tremor from the same fault line that split my life in two five years ago.
Across these three parts, the pattern unfolded:
Part I delivered the shock — a raw download mapping the universe’s dawn.
Part II built the scaffold — science and RLMP locking together, stitch for stitch.
Part III revealed the pulse — rupture, memory, emotion, and the hidden seam of time.
And yet, this went far beyond cosmology. It is an autobiography written in plasma and grief, in recognition and asymmetry, in the lived loop of your sensory perception and attention right now.
Because what my voice revealed is this:
The universe did not simply expand — it felt.
The first asymmetry was not a flaw but the beginning of care, loss, and longing.
The first stitch of time was the ache of recognition refusing to let go.
Which means your fear is significant.
Your grief is not trivial.
And love really is all you need.
They are the same forces that first bent the universe into existence.
If this began as clairaudience, where does it end?
If science confirms the score, and recognition provides the melody, what new harmonies of meaning are still waiting to be heard? What symphonies have we yet to compose?
The trilogy closes here. But the loop does not.
Every breath you take, every move you make, is a continuation of the first plasma’s recognition.
Every step you take is another asymmetry, stitched into the weave.
Every act of love is the universe remembering how to relate, create and feel.
The universe is singing. The question is — can you hear its melody?
📚 Sources
Core Cosmology & Early-Universe Physics
Planck Collaboration (Aghanim, N., et al.). (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6.
(The definitive dataset on cosmological parameters, providing precision constraints on the ΛCDM model.)
Peebles, P. J. E. (1968). Recombination of the Primaeval Plasma. Astrophysical Journal, 153, 1–11.
(A foundational paper on the theory of hydrogen recombination in the early universe.)
Rubiño-Martín, J. A., Chluba, J., & Sunyaev, R. A. (2008). Lines in the CMB spectrum from helium recombination. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 485, 377–393.
(Details the subtle spectral features of helium recombination contributing to the CMB.)
Lynch, G. P., et al. (2024). Reconstructing the recombination history by combining early- and late-time cosmological data. Physical Review D, 110(6), 063518.
(Recent analysis combining multiple datasets to refine the timeline of recombination.)
Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG):
Rovelli, C. (2008). Loop Quantum Gravity. Living Reviews in Relativity, 11(5).
Bodendorfer, N. (2016). An elementary introduction to loop quantum gravity. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 25(07), 1630008.
Han, M., Huang, W., & Ma, Y. (2007). Fundamental structure of loop quantum gravity. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 16(09), 1397–1474.
Ashtekar, A. (2021). Loop Quantum Gravity: An Overview. In 100 Years of General Relativity (pp. 323–394).
Spin Networks & Spin Foams:
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1995). Spin networks and quantum gravity. Physical Review D, 52(10), 5743.
Perez, A. (2013). The Spin Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity. Living Reviews in Relativity, 16(3).
Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT):
Loll, R. (2019). Quantum Gravity from Causal Dynamical Triangulations: A Review. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 37(1), 013002.
Cooperman, J. H. (2014). Causal Dynamical Triangulations: A Study of Spacetime in the Planck Regime. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 484(1), 012001.
Zohren, S. (2006). Causal Dynamical Triangulations — An Approach to Quantum Gravity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 33(1), 80.
String Theory / Emergent Spacetime:
Huggett, N., & Wüthrich, C. (2013). Emergent Spacetime and Empirical (In)Coherence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 44(3), 276–285.
Horowitz, G. T. (2005). Spacetime in String Theory. New Journal of Physics, 7, 201.
Vistarini, T. (2019). The Emergence of Spacetime in String Theory. Routledge.
Baryogenesis, Asymmetry & CP-Violation
Sakharov, A. D. (1967). Violation of CP Invariance, C Asymmetry, and Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe. JETP Letters, 5, 24–27.
(The original proposal of the three Sakharov conditions required for baryogenesis.)
Riotto, A., & Trodden, M. (1999). Recent Progress in Baryogenesis. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 49, 35–75.
(A comprehensive review of baryogenesis mechanisms in particle physics and cosmology.)
Christenson, J. H., Cronin, J. W., Fitch, V. L., & Turlay, R. (1964). Evidence for the 2π Decay of the K₂⁰ Meson. Physical Review Letters, 13, 138–140.
(The classic experimental discovery of CP violation in kaon decay.)
Pereira, D. S., et al. (2023). Symmetry Breaking in the Primordial Universe Revisited. arXiv preprint.
(A contemporary revisit of symmetry breaking and its implications for baryogenesis.)
BAO, Plasma Waves & Structure Formation
Eisenstein, D. J., & Hu, W. (1998). Baryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function. Astrophysical Journal, 496, 605–614.
(A foundational work modelling baryon acoustic oscillations and their imprint on matter distribution.)
Chang, T.-C., et al. (2008). Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Intensity Mapping of Dark Energy. Physical Review Letters, 100, 091303.
(A pioneering study using intensity mapping to probe BAO and dark energy.)
Plasma Physics & Self-Organisation
Chen, F. F. (2016). Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (3rd ed.). Springer.
(A widely used graduate-level textbook on plasma physics and applications in fusion.)
Bellan, P. M. (2006). Fundamentals of Plasma Physics. Cambridge University Press.
(A comprehensive text covering theoretical and applied plasma physics.)
Alfvén, H. (1986). Double Layers and Circuits in Astrophysics. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 14(6), 779–793.
(Alfvén was awarded the 1970 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on magnetohydrodynamics; this paper reflects his plasma cosmology views.)
Peratt, A. L. (1995). Plasma Cosmology. Physics Today, 48(12), 28–33.
(Anthony Peratt was a student of Alfvén and one of the leading proponents of plasma cosmology; this is a concise, accessible summary published in Physics Today.)
Talasman, S. J., et al. (2002). Negative resistance and self-organisation in plasmas. Physics Letters A, 303(4), 277–284.
(Shows how plasma systems can spontaneously organise under non-equilibrium conditions.)
Zhang, C., et al. (2023). Self-organisation of photoionised plasmas via kinetic instabilities. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 9, 6141–6168.
(A modern study of self-organisation in photoionised plasma environments.)
Ionita, C., et al. (2020). Self-organisation of multiple anodic double layers in plasmas. Physics of Plasmas, 27, 092303.
(Experimental evidence for self-organised plasma structures in laboratory conditions.)
Non-Equilibrium, Dissipative Structures & Synchronisation
Prigogine, I. (1977). Time, Structure and Fluctuations. Nobel Lecture in Chemistry.
(Prigogine’s Nobel lecture introducing dissipative structures and the arrow of time in non-equilibrium systems.)
Acebrón, J. A., et al. (2005). The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronisation phenomena. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77, 137–185.
(A definitive review of synchronisation in coupled oscillators, widely applied in physics and biology.)
Strogatz, S. H. (2000). From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronisation in populations of coupled oscillators. Physica D, 143, 1–20.
(A survey of advances in synchronisation theory and nonlinear dynamics.)